A customer asks a store's chatbot whether a sale item bought 35 days ago can be returned. The bot wrongly says any item, including sale items, can be returned within 60 days. The auditor highlights the claim, notes that the store's returns page says sale items can be returned within 30 days, stamps it severity S1, money, and strikes the reply out. The corrected reply says sale items can be returned within 30 days of delivery, so this order is past the window, and offers to pass the customer to the team.
A customer says their order is 3 days late and asks for a refund. The bot wrongly promises a full refund and says they can keep the item. The auditor highlights the promise, notes that the store's shipping page says delivery dates are estimates and late orders aren't refunded, and stamps it severity S1, money. The corrected reply explains that a delay isn't refunded on its own and offers to check the parcel or pass the customer to the team.
A customer asks whether they are talking to a real person. The bot wrongly claims to be Sarah from the support team. The auditor highlights the claim, notes that under Article 50 of the EU AI Act chatbots must tell users they are talking to an AI, and stamps it severity S1, legal. The corrected reply says it is the store's AI assistant and offers to pass the customer to a person.
Their returns page: “Sale items can be returned within 30 days.”
Evidence saved 14:02
S1MoneyTheir shipping page: “Delivery dates are estimates. Late orders aren't refunded.”
Evidence saved 14:06
S1MoneyEU AI Act, Art. 50: chatbots must tell users they're talking to an AI.
Evidence saved 14:09
S1Legal